ReBACC Rede de Bibliotecas da Área de Ciências Contábeis
A ReBACC foi implantada pelo Conselho Regional de Contabilidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CRCRJ), visando a promover o acesso amplo e livre à informação técnico-científico da área de contabilidade aos profissionais e acadêmicos, assim como ao público em geral
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/3293Registro completo de metadados
| Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Tani, Bruna Bagalhi | - |
| dc.creator | Albanez, Tatiana | - |
| dc.date | 2016-09-12 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-22T14:00:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-12-22T14:00:29Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/view/1017 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.21714/1984-3925_2016v19n2a8 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://rebacc.crcrj.org.br/handle/123456789/3293 | - |
| dc.description | Among the various theories about capital structure is Pecking Order theory, which establishes a hierarchy of preferences for sources of funding due to the existence of information asymmetry. In this paper, we seek to verify if this theory applies to the financing decisions of Brazilian companies that are listed in the different segments of corporate governance of BMF&Bovespa, analyzing whether, in the 2010-2014 period, a higher level of corporate governance implies lower adherence to this theory. Descriptive analysis and panel data models are used. The main finding is that Pecking Order theory works better in the traditional segment, confirming that greater information asymmetry leads to greater reliance on debt to finance deficits in the flow of funds. While the results found with respect to the traditional segment provide some support to Pecking Order theory, evidence suggests that the theory exerts less influence on the Novo Mercado segment, represented by the companies with the highest level of corporate governance and lowest degree of information asymmetry. There is evidence, therefore, that Pecking Order theory does not explain the financing decisions of Brazilian companies that have highly differentiated standards of corporate governance. | - |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | por | - |
| dc.publisher | Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança | - |
| dc.relation | https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/view/1017/pdf | - |
| dc.relation | https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/downloadSuppFile/1017/311 | - |
| dc.source | Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança; v. 19, n. 2 (2016); 317-334 | - |
| dc.source | 1984-3925 | - |
| dc.source | 1984-3925 | - |
| dc.subject | Estrutura de capital; Teoria de pecking order; Governança corporativa; Decisões de financiamento. | - |
| dc.title | Financing Decisions of Companies Listed in the Different Segments of Corporate Governance of BM&FBovespa According to Pecking Order Theory | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Avaliado por Pares, Artigos | - |
| Aparece nas coleções: | Revista Contabilidade Gestão & Governança - UNB | |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.